23 Sept 2020

Branding - The Failure of Pear's Soap

Failing to hit the present taste

Pear’s Soap was not, by most accounts, a conventional brand failure. Indeed, it was one of the longest-running brands in marketing history.

The soap was named after London hairdresser Andrew Pears, who patented its transparent design in 1789. During the reign of Queen Victoria, Pear’s Soap became one of the first products in the UK to gain a coherent brand identity through intensive advertising. Indeed, the man behind Pear’s Soap’s early promotional efforts, Thomas J Barratt, has often been referred to as ‘the father of modern advertising.’

Endorsements were used to promote the brand. For instance, Sir Erasmus Wilson, President of the Royal College of Surgeons, guaranteed that Pear’s Soap possessed ‘the properties of an efficient yet mild detergent without any of the objectionable properties of ordinary soaps.’

Barrat also helped Pear’s Soap break into the US market by getting the hugely influencial religious leader Henry Ward Beecher to equate cleanliness, and Pear’s particularly, with Godliness. Once this had been achieved Barratt bought the entire front page of the New York Herald in order to show off this incredible testimonial.

The ‘Bubbles’ campaign, featuring an illustration of a baby boy bathed in bubbles, was particularly successful and established Pear’s as a part of everyday life on both sides of the Atlantic. However, Barratt recognized the ever-changing nature of marketing. ‘Tastes change, fashions change, and the advertiser has to change with them,’ the Pear’s advertising man said in a 1907 interview. ‘An idea that was effective a generation ago would fall flat, stale, and unprofitable if presented to the public today. Not that the idea of today is always better than the older idea, but it is different – it hits the present taste.’


Throughout the first half of the 20th century, Pear’s remained the leading soap brand in the UK. However, towards the end of the century, the market was starting to radically evolve.

Over the past 100 years, soap has reflected the development of consumer culture. Some of the earliest brand names were given to soap; it was one of the first mass-produced goods to be packaged and the subject of some of the earliest ad campaigns. Its manufacturers pioneered market research; the first TV ads were for soap; soap operas, tales of domestic melodrama, were so named because they were often sponsored by soap companies. Soap made men rich – William Hesketh Lever, the 33-year-old who built Port Sunlight [where Pear’s was produced], for one – and it is no coincidence that two of the world’s oldest and biggest multinationals, Unilever and Procter & Gamble, rose to power on the back of soap.

Recently though, a change has emerged. The mass-produced block has been abandoned for its liquid versions – shower gels, body washes and liquid soap dispensers. In pursuit of our ideal of cleanliness, the soap bar has been deemed unhygienic.

Of course, this was troubling news for the Pear’s Soap brand and, by the end of the last century, its market share of the soap market had dropped to a low of 3 per cent. Marketing fell to almost zero. Then came the fatal blow. On 22 February 2000 parent company Unilever announced it was to discontinue the Pear’s brand. The cost-saving decision was part of a broader strategy by Unilever to concentrate on 400 ‘power’ brands and to terminate the other 1,200. Other brands for the chop included Radion washing powder and Harmony hairspray.

So why had Pear’s lost its power? Well, the shift towards liquid soaps and shower gels was certainly a factor. But Unilever held onto Dove, another soap bar brand, which still fares exceptionally well. Ultimately, Pear’s was a brand

What were the lessons learned from the Pear’s case? Well, firstly, every brand has its time. Pear’s Soap was a historical success, but the product became incompatible with contemporary trends and tastes. Secondly, advertising can help build a brand. But brands built on advertising generally need advertising to sustain them.

Taken from HERE.

3 comments:

  1. Pear’s Soap disappeared from the world because it was unable to adapt, either the product and the advertisement. If We want our products to survive in the market, We must adjust our products to the market taste. Market’s taste always changes, so We can not just keep our product the same in every period. We need to make innovations according to the current trend. If the current trend is about a cute shape, perhaps We can make the soap’s shape become cuter like a pear fruit’s shape. The same thing applies to the advertisement. We can not just do the same endorsement every year, We need to adjust to the technology development. Rather than keep endorsing Sir Erasmus Wilson, the soap should’ve made an advertisement in the newspaper or television so it can reach wider populations of people. Besides gaining people's trust, We also need to attract public attention by making eye-catching advertisements.

    ReplyDelete
  2. As a consumer, I myself would much prefer to use liquid soap than a block soap. While it is also because of hygiene reasons, It is also about the efficiency. Like most of the consumers nowadays, I would like my soap to not slip trough my hands while I try to slather it across my body. And for now, the best option you could get from the market is liquid soap. Perhaps pears should have adapted with the situation and make a new line for pears liquid soap as it would benefit them as much as it would benefit their loyal customer. Customer would be more likely to trust brands that they’re familiar with.

    This case is quite similar to the bankruptcy of nokia. They too didn’t adapt to smartphone, hence they can not qualify what the market demands. The pear soap and nokia should be set as a lesson to future businesses. If they want to stay in the industry they must innovate and adapt to market. Or else they would end up being brushed aside by other competitors.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Pear’s Soap was unable to adapt with their current situation. Everything in our daily life are slowly changing and adapting to something better so everyone should be able to keep up with the trends. Pear’s Soap was once very famous but right now I have never even heard of their name until now, I learned that in order to survive in the market industry, we have to be able to make innovations or else we will be forgotten like the Pear’s Soap. No matter how big the companies or the brands are if its not able to adapt with its surrounding, they will eventually loses with the new ones. Even though we still see the soap bar in the markets, a lot of people prefer the liquid ones, including me. I agree with this article because I also feel soap bar is unhygienic, it is slippery and most likely to fall to the floor. That is why I think it is not as hygienic as the liquid soap.

    ReplyDelete

No trolling, no flaming, no profanity, no plagiarism!